Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Due to lack of a mingw toolchain, I can't tell you exactly what goes
> wrong for you.
>
> 3 likely candidates:
> * The cross gcc doesn't produce *.exe's (This would be a gcc bug).
> * You are not correctly invoking configure.
> * Makefile bug somewhere.
Is there need to hyp
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > check_PROGRAMS = test-lock$(EXEEXT)
> >
> > TESTS = test-lock
> ...
> What about @substituted@ values?
TESTS = @substituted@
You could treat it like @substituted@ in check_PROGRAMS, namely
- assume that $(EXEEXT) is contained in the substituted value,
- warn if EXTR
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:15 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 21:51 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> >> [For the automake people: The problem is that a Makefile.am snippet like
> >>
> >> TESTS = test-lock
> >> check_PROGRA
Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 21:51 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> [For the automake people: The problem is that a Makefile.am snippet like
>>
>> TESTS = test-lock
>> check_PROGRAMS = test-lock
>> test_LOCK_LDFLAGS = -lmyspeciallib
>>
>> when cr
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:51:57PM CET:
>
> ...
> noinst_PROGRAMS =
> check_PROGRAMS = test-lock$(EXEEXT)
>
> TESTS = test-lock
>
> check-am: all-am
> $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $(check_PROGRAMS)
> $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) check-TESTS
>
> check-TESTS: $(T
