Re: Info files--declaration and distribution

2005-12-31 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Karl, On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 11:41:40AM -0600, Karl Berry wrote: > > I suggest that the info files should not be distributed by default. > > Well, I strongly, strongly, disagree, and so do the GNU standards, and > GNU practice for the last 20 years. I can't see how dropping them would

Re: help

2005-12-31 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Darius, sorry, this list is intended for reports of bugs in the Automake pacakge. Please try to find a more apropriate mailing list. Happy new your to you, Stepan

help

2005-12-31 Thread dariush koorush
Hi I downloaded archimedes-0.0.4 from gnu.org . my os is fedora core 2 during installation i recive some massege that comes below.  i think , maybe some rpm packages this software has needed that i dont install them. with this report can you say me which rpm packeges need for installing this softw

Info files--declaration and distribution

2005-12-31 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, 1) I suggest that the info files should not be distributed by default. Current situation: Automake-generated makefiles distribute *.info files by default. But the installation rules can install this file only if the program install-info is available. Because both install-info and makein