(no subject)

2005-03-16 Thread John Crews
Do you ejaculte before or after few minutes of penetration? Then you MUST read this important new information! At last something can be done against this embarssing problem which leads to discomfort even in long established relationships. If you are man enough to read on... go here. Not interest

Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:08:06PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > Thanks, I'm installing the following fix on HEAD and branch-1-9. > > ... > > -## Recover from the removal of $@ > > - @if test ! -f $@; then \ > > +## Recover from the removal of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Stepan Kasal wrote: > > mv -f elc-temp $@ > > .. > > > mv -f elc-temp $@ || { touch $@; rm -f elc-temp; } > > But this change is incorrect. It canmcels the whole trick: > > touch tmp > ... > mv tmp $@ > > ensures that the stamp file will be older than the files created by > "

Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:08:06PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > mv -f elc-temp $@ .. > mv -f elc-temp $@ || { touch $@; rm -f elc-temp; } But this change is incorrect. It canmcels the whole trick: touch tmp ... mv tmp $@ ensures that the stamp file will be olde

Re: gettext-0.14.2 fails on parallel build

2005-03-16 Thread Bruno Haible
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Thanks, I'm installing the following fix on HEAD and branch-1-9. > ... > -## Recover from the removal of $@ > - @if test ! -f $@; then \ > +## Recover from the removal of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +## > +## Make sure not to call `make elc-stamp' if emacs is not available