On 10/15/24 9:44 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 15.10.24 15:32, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/15/24 2:16 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> On 14.10.24 20:29, Eric Woudstra wrote:
It would be no problem for me to change the subject and body, if you
think that is better.
On 10/16/24 9:43 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 14/10/2024 21:34, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/24 8:59 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 13/10/2024 21:55, Eric Woudstra wrote:
New function dev_fill_bridge_path(), similar to dev_fill_forward_path().
It handles startin
Kernel bugzilla new report forwarding to bridge maintainers
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 06:44:35 +
From: bugzilla-dae...@kernel.org
To: step...@networkplumber.org
Subject: [Bug 198297] Unable to add ethX to bridge if ethX. is already
present in this bridge
https://bugzi
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:16:55PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Since SLOB was removed and since
> commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from
> kmem_cache_destroy()"),
> it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs
> kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() direc
On 14/10/2024 21:34, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/24 8:59 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 13/10/2024 21:55, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>>> New function dev_fill_bridge_path(), similar to dev_fill_forward_path().
>>> It handles starting from a bridge port instead of the bridge master.
>>> Th
