Re: DNSSEC migration sanity check

2020-08-20 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Hi John, It all depends on the key material that is used to sign your zone. It looks like you have to update the DNSKEY RRset, so I assume the vendors are responsible for signing and each have their own key material. In order to let the world know you are going to use new keys you will have to pr

RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.16.6

2020-08-20 Thread Carl Byington via bind-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source rpms, and build instructions. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iHMEAREKADMWIQSuFMepaSkjWnTxQ5QvqPuaKVMWwQUCXz7EtRUcY2FybEBmaXZl LXRlbi1zZy5jb20ACgkQL6j7milTFsHXUwCffZxEKWp/Ssbw7cXJa

Re: RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.16.6

2020-08-20 Thread PGNet Dev
On 8/20/20 11:45 AM, Carl Byington via bind-users wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > https://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source > rpms, and build instructions. How/why are these^ generally different than the isc-maintained pkgs at htt

Re: Error "Query section mismatch : got"

2020-08-20 Thread Smile TV
As for Viettel, I don't know how they configure it. But when I use a server on another network, the result is as follows: ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R8 <<>> @115.84.177.8 250.0-24.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa ptr ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status:

Re: Error "Query section mismatch : got"

2020-08-20 Thread Smile TV
> my question is why would anyone do this, as this apparently does not make > sense. Because when I was from a server that was querying the reverse record 250.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa it gave an error with the "SERVFAIL" error code so I tried to query directly to the hosting that managed it to de