Not to the list but just to you.
I could imagine a system having multiple views defined with only one view
that allows DDNS updates. The other views would be "read-only". This
wouldn't be pretty, but ...
In this one view that allows DDNS, you wouldn't be restricted to ONLY "A"
records. User
I take it this is not possible using update-policy?
_
Nicholas Miller, ITS, University of Colorado at Boulder
On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
Is it possible to restrict user machines to only be able to update
thei
Is it possible to restrict user machines to only be able to update
their 'A' records on a specific subnet? We would like to allow DDNS
but restrict it to specific subnets and only allow the machines to
update their 'A' records. Allow-updates will not get us the record
restrictions we would
3 matches
Mail list logo
