Are you sure the named you build was invoked? What if you directly
start the named executable by hand? For example, what's the result of
this?
(go down to the source directory where you built bind)
# cd bin/named
# ./named -g
# ./named -g -u bind -n 8 -t /var/lib/named -c /etc/bind/named.conf
-
On 4 dic, 19:43, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
>
>
> pollex writes:
> > On 4 dic, 10:59, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --enable-threads=3Dyes
>
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > com>,
>
> > > pollex writes:
> > > >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pollex writes:
> On 4 dic, 10:59, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --enable-threads=3Dyes
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> com>,
> >
> > pollex writes:
> > > On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > In messa
On 4 dic, 10:59, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --enable-threads=yes
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> pollex writes:
> > On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > com>,
>
> > > pollex writes:
> > > > Hi Jinmei I have f
--enable-threads=yes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pollex writes:
> On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> com>,
> >
> > pollex writes:
> > > Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and
> > > compiled the Bind 9.3
On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> pollex writes:
> > Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and
> > compiled the Bind 9.3.6 with the following command:
> > STD_CDEFINES="-ISC_SOCKET_FDSETSIZE=4096" ./configure --prefix
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pollex writes:
> Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and
> compiled the Bind 9.3.6 with the following command:
> STD_CDEFINES="-ISC_SOCKET_FDSETSIZE=4096" ./configure --prefix=/usr/
> local/bind9.3.6 --enable-threads
> But now I have the foll
At Tue, 2 Dec 2008 05:17:17 -0800 (PST),
pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and
> compiled the Bind 9.3.6 with the following command:
> STD_CDEFINES="-ISC_SOCKET_FDSETSIZE=4096" ./configure --prefix=/usr/
> local/bind9.3.6 --enable-thread
On 20 nov, 17:09, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:30:00 -0800 (PST),
>
> pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "9.3.4-P1.1" still seems to be a Debian specific version, but if this
> > > is featurewise equivalent to 9.3.5-P1, you should at least upgrade to
On 20 nov, 17:09, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:30:00 -0800 (PST),
>
> pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "9.3.4-P1.1" still seems to be a Debian specific version, but if this
> > > is featurewise equivalent to 9.3.5-P1, you should at least upgrade to
At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:30:00 -0800 (PST),
pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "9.3.4-P1.1" still seems to be a Debian specific version, but if this
> > is featurewise equivalent to 9.3.5-P1, you should at least upgrade to
> > 9.3.5-P2 (and build it with a large value of ISC_SOCKET_MAXSOCKETS).
>
On 19 nov, 13:32, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:03:23 -0800 (PST),
>
> pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with
> > > apt-get install bind9) and I
At Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:03:23 -0800 (PST),
pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with
> > apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open
> > file descriptors" messages.
> Th
On Nov 19, 2008, at 5:03 AM, pollex wrote:
The version of bind is "BIND 9.3.4-P1.1"
And the error appears when named open around of 1000 sockets:
lsof | grep named | wc -l
968
If I have to reinstall bind, there are any way to do it via apt-get?
Or the only way is compiling the binaries?
Thanks
re FDs as ours did.
>
> HTH -- Chris
>
> =A0
>
> - Original Message
> From: pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:04:55 AM
> Subject: socket: too many open file descriptors
>
> Hello,
> Running bind9 9.
TED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:04:55 AM
Subject: socket: too many open file descriptors
Hello,
Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with
apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open
file descriptors" mess
At Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:04:55 -0800 (PST),
pollex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with
> apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open
> file descriptors" messages.
This version numbe
Hello,
Running bind9 9.3.4-2etch3 on Debian etch 4.0(last stable version with
apt-get install bind9) and I continue to get "socket: too many open
file descriptors" messages.
my ulimit -a:
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimite
18 matches
Mail list logo