ailto:r...@loonybin.net]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 18:46
To: Evan Hunt
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: rndc addzone/delzone in 9.7.2rc1 (was: rndc reconfig delays)
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Evan Hunt wrote:
> "Non-obvious" isn't the point. We thought of having the file
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Evan Hunt wrote:
"Non-obvious" isn't the point. We thought of having the file be named
directly after the view, but view names are allowed to include characters
that are forbidden in file names. Before opening the file we'd have to
check the name's legality, ensure it does
> I'm having a hard time following the motivation behind these changes. Why
> is the filename non-configurable and non-obvious?
"Non-configurable" may change.
"Non-obvious" isn't the point. We thought of having the file be named
directly after the view, but view names are allowed to include ch
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Rob Foehl wrote:
My next step is going to be to experiment with the rndc addzone/delzone
feature in the 9.7.2 betas, which hopefully should avoid any need to attempt
a reconfig during normal use. That aside, is there anything else I could be
doing to speed things up?
I
Probably. I'd like to get Michael's feedback... I have not heard of
this from anyone else have either of you?
On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Rob Foehl wrote:
I've been experimenting with loading a large number of master zones
(on the order of 250,000) in a single BIND instance, and have
I've been experimenting with loading a large number of master zones (on
the order of 250,000) in a single BIND instance, and have noticed that
'rndc reconfig' with this many zones loaded can take a very long time to
determine that it has little or nothing to do. Worse, the server stops
answeri
6 matches
Mail list logo
