Re: ipv6 BIND reverse lookup question/problem

2009-01-19 Thread David Holder
Bryce, The following format is correct: 2.5.0.0.1.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.a.0.0.0.6.d.f.0.ip6.arpa Webmin is formatting the entry incorrectly. Regards, David Dr David Holder CEng FIET MIEEE Erion Ltd, Oaklei

Re: ipv6 BIND reverse lookup question/problem

2009-01-17 Thread Danny Mayer
Bryce Burgess (bburgess) wrote: > I don't get an "ANSWER SECTION" part of the response to a 'dig -x' cmd > for the reverse lookup for IPV6 addresses. I do for IPV4. > Is the format of the reverse ipv6 not correct? > Webmin automatically gen's the green and will not allow the blue data > below to be

re: ipv6 BIND reverse lookup question/problem

2009-01-17 Thread Bryce Burgess (bburgess)
I don't get an "ANSWER SECTION" part of the response to a 'dig -x' cmd for the reverse lookup for IPV6 addresses. I do for IPV4. Is the format of the reverse ipv6 not correct? Webmin automatically gen's the green and will not allow the blue data below to be entered (complains of invalid data when a