On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:47:02PM +0100, Klaus Malorny wrote:
> I would have expected to get a "SUCCESS" also, i.e. that the negative
> answer could have been validated so far. Did I miss anything? For zones
> using NSEC, like "se", this seems to work. Is there no full support for
> NSEC3 in d
Hi,
I am playing around with a signed zone which uses NSEC3. If I try to verify a
non-existing name or a non-existing type with the "sigchase" option, I get the
strange error:
;; Impossible to verify the Non-existence, the NSEC RRset can't be validated:
FAILED
I then checked it with the "o
2 matches
Mail list logo
