Re: problems in forwarding

That's not what SERVFAIL is for. You need a different architecture. If you want to resolve both internal and external names, then you need a version of the zone that has *both* sets of names in it. Your architecture should be built around that concept.

Re: problems in forwarding

Sorry for the spam, but again regarding question 2, is it possible for the name server to respond without the authoritative flag set and then BIND could contact other servers? On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Luis Silva wrote: > Regarding question 2, is it possible for the name server to respon

Re: problems in forwarding

Regarding question 2, is it possible for the name server to respond servfail and then BIND could contact other servers? On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Luis Silva wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas < > uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > >> On 07.08.09 10:50, Luis Si

Re: problems in forwarding

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 07.08.09 10:50, Luis Silva wrote: > > 1 - I need to be a slave for the zones "testing.es" and "testing2.es" > but > > everything else must be redirected to the 10.112.15.3 server. Do you > think > > the example bellow is correct?

Re: problems in forwarding

On 07.08.09 10:50, Luis Silva wrote: > 1 - I need to be a slave for the zones "testing.es" and "testing2.es" but > everything else must be redirected to the 10.112.15.3 server. Do you think > the example bellow is correct? The problem is that everytime I send a > request to the forward zone, my ser

problems in forwarding

Hi all, I'm configuring my BIND server and I have two questions related with forwarding. 1 - I need to be a slave for the zones "testing.es" and "testing2.es" but everything else must be redirected to the 10.112.15.3 server. Do you think the example bellow is correct? The problem is that everytim