Re: port 53 tcp/udp

2012-07-17 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/17/2012 03:07 PM, nex6 wrote: > I told them to unblock port 53 tcp then call me Good answer. :) ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.

Re: port 53 tcp/udp

2012-07-17 Thread nex6
* Lance Bailey [2012-07-17 14:50:43 -0700]: > On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:43:34 PM UTC-7, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <20120717194840.GA3773@glasya2>, nex6 writes: > > > when does bind or dns in general use tcp and when does it use udp? > > > > When it needs to. TCP support is NOT option

Re: port 53 tcp/udp

2012-07-17 Thread nex6
* Mark Andrews [2012-07-18 07:43:34 +1000]: > > In message <20120717194840.GA3773@glasya2>, nex6 writes: > > when does bind or dns in general use tcp and when does it use udp? > > When it needs to. TCP support is NOT optional. > > > from what i have read, from the client intial request if un

Re: port 53 tcp/udp

2012-07-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20120717194840.GA3773@glasya2>, nex6 writes: > when does bind or dns in general use tcp and when does it use udp? When it needs to. TCP support is NOT optional. > from what i have read, from the client intial request if under 512b > come in on UDP port 53, if and depending on the l

port 53 tcp/udp

2012-07-17 Thread nex6
when does bind or dns in general use tcp and when does it use udp? from what i have read, from the client intial request if under 512b come in on UDP port 53, if and depending on the local resolver in needs to retry it *could* be a tcp port 53 request? now thats client to name server; what abo