Re: nsec and nsec3 records

2009-06-14 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , R Dicai re writes: > Hi folks, > Can both nsec and nsec3 records be used simultaneously in a zone file, > or is it an either/or? NSEC and NSEC3 chains are expected to exist in a zone during a incremental transition between the two ways of negatively

Re: nsec and nsec3 records

2009-06-13 Thread Evan Hunt
> Currently I'm using bind 9.4.x, with NSEC records, but looking to move > to 9.6.1, in fact my slaves are already 9.6.1, but my master isn't > yet. I've recently read where .org has been signed, and using NSEC3. I > thought it might be a good idea to resign my zones using NSEC3, but > was unaware

Re: nsec and nsec3 records

2009-06-13 Thread R Dicaire
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Evan Hunt wrote: > Why would you want them both?  If you don't mind the drawbacks of NSEC, > why take on the operational and computational burdens of NSEC3? I don't know why, I'm simply not knowledgeable enough in DNSSEC deployment. Currently I'm using bind 9.4.x,

Re: nsec and nsec3 records

2009-06-13 Thread Evan Hunt
> Can both nsec and nsec3 records be used simultaneously in a zone file, > or is it an either/or? Why would you want them both? If you don't mind the drawbacks of NSEC, why take on the operational and computational burdens of NSEC3? To answer the question, while I don'

nsec and nsec3 records

2009-06-13 Thread R Dicaire
Hi folks, Can both nsec and nsec3 records be used simultaneously in a zone file, or is it an either/or? Thanks -- aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present: http://www.ardynet.com http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u ___ bind-users mailing list bind