Re: new bind 9.9 and root NS

2012-08-06 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Doug O'Leary Date: Monday, August 6, 2012 9:58 AM To: 'Doug Barton' , Mike Hoskins Cc: "comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org" Subject: RE: new bind 9.9 and root NS >After the network admin verified there was no firewall rule differenc

Re: new bind 9.9 and root NS

2012-08-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/05/2012 23:05, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > This almost sounds like an upstream firewall or proxy with faulty protocol > "fixups". If you do a query and EDNS is blocked or improperly configured > a "fall back" will occur which causes queries to take longer or possibly > timeout. +1

Re: new bind 9.9 and root NS

2012-08-05 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: "dkole...@olearycomputers.com" Organization: http://groups.google.com Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 2:16 PM To: "comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org" Subject: new bind 9.9 and root NS >I have a client who's migrating from an old bind 9.3

new bind 9.9 and root NS

2012-08-05 Thread dkole...@olearycomputers.com
Hi; I have a client who's migrating from an old bind 9.3 installation to a new bind 9.9. I've done the migration and everything seemed to be running fine. Before switching the internic pointers, though, the client gave it a good thorough trashing and they're finding some issues. On the new syst