In message <5201cce6.2040...@pacbell.net>, Eduardo Bonsi writes:
> Dear Noel and Mark,
>
> Thanks for your input!
>
> After thinking about the ipv6 network configuration pros and cons, I
> decided to go for the ULA for my internal network and use the /64
> creating static ips for my WAN. To ge
Dear Noel and Mark,
Thanks for your input!
After thinking about the ipv6 network configuration pros and cons, I
decided to go for the ULA for my internal network and use the /64
creating static ips for my WAN. To get a set of ULA addresses I logged to:
http://www.simpledns.com/private-ipv6.a
Mark,
I really did not mean things that way when I used the word "happy". Let
say that I am concerned with it and that means if anyone can express
their views towards being more secure with ipv6, I am sure to
considerate it. We probably diverge on opinions about exposing MAC
addresses as a pu
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 13:28 -0700, Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have some questions about ipV6 transition and DNS configuration!
>
> I am preparing to make my transition to a dual stack ipv4, ipv6 and I
> have some concerns in regards to the security of the network since ipv6
>
In message <51feb96d.3070...@pacbell.net>, Eduardo Bonsi writes:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have some questions about ipV6 transition and DNS configuration!
>
> I am preparing to make my transition to a dual stack ipv4, ipv6 and I
> have some concerns in regards to the security of the network sinc
Hello Everyone,
I have some questions about ipV6 transition and DNS configuration!
I am preparing to make my transition to a dual stack ipv4, ipv6 and I
have some concerns in regards to the security of the network since ipv6
do not have NAT. My ISP gave me a Global
2602:000:000:000:000:000:00
6 matches
Mail list logo
