They fail when presented with EDNS version 1 queries and unknown
edns options. EDNS version 1 behaviour has been documented for
nearly 15 years. Is it that hard to return BADVERS rather than
FORMERR? It's like the vendor never read RFC 2671 or RFC 6891 which
obsoletes RFC 2671.
How are these s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dig phantom.eia.gov. @205.254.135.9 +dnssec +norecur
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30660
;; flags: qr aa ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
dig phantom.eia.gov. @205.254.135.9 +dnssec +nsid +norecur
;; ->>HEAD
2 matches
Mail list logo