Re: dotted hostname is bad IMO

2011-02-02 Thread Kevin Darcy
So, let me see if I have this correctly: you think that DNS architects and/or planners should constrain their choices with respect to namespace layout and/or delegation hierarchy, because of some minor performance considerations, based on your _speculations_ (without any hard evidence) about ho

Re: dotted hostname is bad IMO

2011-02-01 Thread Joseph S D Yao
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:11:47AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: ... > So I dont think dotted hostname is good pratical. ... You need to read the whole posting. Another poster pointed out that the dot _ I S _ the DNS delimiter. -- /**

RE: dotted hostname is bad IMO

2011-02-01 Thread Vyto Grigaliunas
o:bind- > users-bounces+vyto=fnal@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Margolin > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:57 AM > To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org > Subject: Re: dotted hostname is bad IMO > > In article , > p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > > > given the doma

Re: dotted hostname is bad IMO

2011-02-01 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote: > given the domain name of "126.com", and given an A RR in its zone is: > > s1.s2.s3 IN A 11.22.33.44 > > OK when a dns cache query for s1.s2.s3.126.com the first time, it will > follow the logic: > > #1, s1.s2.s3.126.com has NS RR in cache? (no

dotted hostname is bad IMO

2011-01-31 Thread pyh
given the domain name of "126.com", and given an A RR in its zone is: s1.s2.s3 IN A 11.22.33.44 OK when a dns cache query for s1.s2.s3.126.com the first time, it will follow the logic: #1, s1.s2.s3.126.com has NS RR in cache? (no) #2, s2.s3.126.com has NS RR in cache? (no) #3, s3.126.c