RE: Re: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-17 Thread Woodworth, John R
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:40:30 +0100, > > Paul A wrote: > > > > > > I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. > > > > > > Are you expecting to save yourself trouble by doing so? > > If not, you should probably reconsider. > > > > If you decide DNAME is a useful trick, bear in mi

Re: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-17 Thread Woodworth, John R
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:40:30 +0100, > Paul A wrote: > > > > I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. > > > Are you expecting to save yourself trouble by doing so? > If not, you should probably reconsider. > > If you decide DNAME is a useful trick, bear in mind that what DNAME >

RE: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-14 Thread Paul A
reverse delegation On 14.10.15 10:11, Paul A wrote: >Niall my problem is the name server that delegated the reserve does look up the record correctly. > >I have this in the zone, > >DNAME 0/24 >;; > delegate to server >;; >0/24NS ns.som

Re: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 14.10.15 10:11, Paul A wrote: Niall my problem is the name server that delegated the reserve does look up the record correctly. I have this in the zone, DNAME 0/24 ;; ;;; delegate to server ;; 0/24NS ns.someserver.com ;; At the ns.someserver.com the looks u

RE: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-14 Thread Paul A
.orei...@ucd.ie] Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 6:29 PM To: Paul A Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: dname reverse delegation On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:40:30 +0100, Paul A wrote: > > I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. Are you expecting to save yourself trouble

Re: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-13 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:40:30 +0100, Paul A wrote: > > I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. Are you expecting to save yourself trouble by doing so? If not, you should probably reconsider. If you decide DNAME is a useful trick, bear in mind that what DNAME does is not real

Re: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-13 Thread Tony Finch
Paul A wrote: > I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. > Lets says I have 192.168.13.0/24 how would I go about doing reserve on the > forwarding server using DNAME. Coincidentally I just published this draft less than three hours ago, and it describes how to use DNAME to reduce th

Re: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-13 Thread Mark Andrews
Why are you trying to complicate the lookup process unnecessarially? Just delegate 13.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA. People over use stuff that really isn't needed and by doing so turn a relatively simple proceedure into a complicated mess. RFC 2317 delegation techniques really should only be used for /

dname reverse delegation

2015-10-13 Thread Paul A
I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. Lets says I have 192.168.13.0/24 how would I go about doing reserve on the forwarding server using DNAME. Currently on the forwarding server I have NS ns.isp.com ;; DNAME 0/24 ;;