In article ,
"Spain, Dr. Jeffry A." wrote:
> Rather than running multiple bind instances on one server, is virtualization
> an option for you? Thus you could build multiple virtual machines each
> running a single bind instance.
Seems like overkill if BIND is the only thing you're running on
>> I need to understand the difference between configuring bind views and
>> having multiple instances of bind. I have 5 network interfaces on my
>> server and I want to have 2 instances of DNS server (just for testing)
>> and I don't know which one to do ?
> BIND views are powerful, but config
> I need to understand the difference between configuring bind views and
> having multiple instances of bind. I have 5 network interfaces on my server
> and I want to have 2 instances of DNS server (just for testing) and I don't
> know which one to do ?
BIND views are powerful, but configuring the
In article ,
Mike Hoskins wrote:
> the other thing is if your testing needs to stop/start named for some
> reason, it might be less impactful to run separate instances. however, if
> you run 'rndc' you will see that many of the commands can be ran in a
> manner that only affects specified views
-Original Message-
From: Amira Othman
Date: Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:04 AM
To:
Subject: different between views and having multiple instances
>Hi all
>
>I need to understand the difference between configuring bind views and
>having multiple instances of bind. I have 5 networ
views and having multiple instances
Hi all
I need to understand the difference between configuring bind views and
having multiple instances of bind. I have 5 network interfaces on my server
and I want to have 2 instances of DNS server (just for testing) and I don't
know which one to do
Hi all
I need to understand the difference between configuring bind views and
having multiple instances of bind. I have 5 network interfaces on my server
and I want to have 2 instances of DNS server (just for testing) and I don't
know which one to do ?
thanks
7 matches
Mail list logo
