On Sun, 2022-02-20 at 08:16 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> EDNS is hop by hop. There is no copying by any compliant server.
Fair enough. I thought it was a long shot.
Cheers,
b.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the developme
EDNS is hop by hop. There is no copying by any compliant server.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 20 Feb 2022, at 06:32, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 19:02 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>> what's the point of this setup?
>> BIND can resolve by itself perfectly and you wouldn
On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 19:02 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> what's the point of this setup?
> BIND can resolve by itself perfectly and you wouldn't rely on 3rd
> party
> service
Except that it cannot do EDE, as I already said in my original message.
Cheers,
b.
signature.asc
Descri
On 19.02.22 12:31, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I have a BIND9 server configured as a resolver for the local network to
forward all requests to 1.1.1.1.
what's the point of this setup?
BIND can resolve by itself perfectly and you wouldn't rely on 3rd party
service
Given that that 1.1.1.1 includ
I have a BIND9 server configured as a resolver for the local network to
forward all requests to 1.1.1.1. Given that that 1.1.1.1 includes
(RFC8914) EDE EDNS options in it's responses, can I configure the BIND
resolver to forward those EDNS options in it's response to the client?
While I know BIND
5 matches
Mail list logo