Has the newsgroup gateway been switched off or is it just broken? The
most recent post for this newsgroup in Google groups is 15-Feb-2011.
--
John Marshall
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
On Monday 24 August 2009 at 23:32 (CET), Andy Shellam wrote:
> > It's gotten worse. Today I'm seeing quadruple messages in the "I have a
> > question concerning the spf" thread. Two plain text messages, and two
> > that are just a big block of base64 encoding.
>
> Strangely enough, just for that
It's gotten worse. Today I'm seeing quadruple messages in the "I have a
question concerning the spf" thread. Two plain text messages, and two
that are just a big block of base64 encoding.
Strangely enough, just for that thread, we got 2 identical messages on
bind-us...@lists.isc.org.
_
In article ,
Sam Wilson wrote:
> In article ,
> Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> > It looks like there are two mail-to-news gateways running for
> > bind-users, so every message to the list is being posted twice to the
> > newsgroup. ...
>
> But at least messages are now being posted to the news
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> It looks like there are two mail-to-news gateways running for
> bind-users, so every message to the list is being posted twice to the
> newsgroup. ...
But at least messages are now being posted to the newsgroup - the
gatewaying, at least as seen from her
sc.org/mailman/options/bind-users>,
+ <mailto:bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
***
*** 31,32
! Errors-To: bind-users-boun...@isc.org
! Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.protocols.dns.bind:2013
--- 37
! Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.
I note that the last posting in comp.protocols.dns.bind seems to have
been on 4-Jun-09, both on my local news server and on Google Groups. I
can't see any relevant announcements in the archive. What's happened?
Sam
___
bind-users mailing
What's worse than a mail-to-news gateway that leaving the multipart crap
headers in the body but removing the "Content-Type:
multipart/alternative" line from the header
In article , MontyRee
wrote:
> CkhlbGxvLCBhbGwuCiAKVGhhbmtzIGZvciBraW5kIGFuc3dlcmluZyBmb3IgRE5BTUUuCkkgaGF2
> ZSBhZGRpdG
On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
Hi all,
Suppose a file named file.pdf stored in the following web location:
http://some_domain/path/to/file.pdf
Where, the *some_domain* is a name-based virtual host. In this case,
is it possible to set a ddns hostname, say through
http://www.ch
Hi all,
Suppose a file named file.pdf stored in the following web location:
http://some_domain/path/to/file.pdf
Where, the *some_domain* is a name-based virtual host. In this case,
is it possible to set a ddns hostname, say through
http://www.changeip.net/, without using *some_domain* itself
In article ,
cmad...@hiwaay.net (Chris Adams) wrote:
> Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> > I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
>
> While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
> It appears messages from the mail-to-news gateway get the Message-ID:
> chan
In message <_aednq2trrolj9runz2dnuvz_tlin...@posted.hiwaay2>, Chris Adams write
s:
> Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> > I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
>
> While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
> It appears messages from the mail-to-news gatew
Once upon a time, Mark Andrews said:
> I've raised a ticket with our ops people.
While you are at it, could you see about fixing the Usenet threading?
It appears messages from the mail-to-news gateway get the Message-ID:
changed (often a bad idea) BUT the gateway doesn't update the
Referen
In message , Sam Wilson wri
tes:
> In article ,
> Chris Buxton wrote:
>
> > On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > > The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
> > > extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
> >
> > The old mail server stripped message
In article ,
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
> > extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
>
> The old mail server stripped messages down to their plaintext values.
> The new one
In article , sch...@adi.com (Thomas Schulz)
wrote:
> I was wondering what was going on. Some messages are just base64 and are
> completely useless/unreadable.
If you have mimencode you could try this:
$ mimencode -u > /tmp/weird ; less /tmp/weird
On Mac OS X and other systems with the right
On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:57 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
The old mail-to-news gateway either got this right or
extracted the plain text alternative before forwarding.
The old mail server stripped messages down to their plaintext values.
The new one does not - it allows both formatted text and atta
In article ,
Sam Wilson wrote:
>In article ,
> Barry Margolin wrote:
>
>> Does anyone still read this list via the comp.protocols.dns.bind Usenet
>> gateway? I do, and ever since the web site and mailing list revamp last
>> month, it has been a real PITA. About
In article ,
Barry Margolin wrote:
> Does anyone still read this list via the comp.protocols.dns.bind Usenet
> gateway? I do, and ever since the web site and mailing list revamp last
> month, it has been a real PITA. About 1/3 of the messages in the group
> have all sorts of
Does anyone still read this list via the comp.protocols.dns.bind Usenet
gateway? I do, and ever since the web site and mailing list revamp last
month, it has been a real PITA. About 1/3 of the messages in the group
have all sorts of MIME garbage in the body of the messages. The problem
20 matches
Mail list logo
