Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 10/10/2011 11:13 AM, enigmedia wrote: On 10/10/2011 9:26 AM, Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP wrote: If you are going to update the IP and TTL, why not adjust both? This will take care of some broken DNS packages. Hth Thanks, I had googled around a bit and saw some conflicting opinions abo

Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread enigmedia
On 10/10/2011 9:26 AM, Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP wrote: > If you are going to update the IP and TTL, why not adjust both? This will take care of some broken DNS packages. > > Hth Thanks, I had googled around a bit and saw some conflicting opinions about whether TTL'ing the MX was necessary o

Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP
If you are going to update the IP and TTL, why not adjust both? This will take care of some broken DNS packages. Hth Sent from my iPhone On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:42 AM, "enigmedia" wrote: > Hi All: If I need to set a short TTL prior to an MX IP change, do I need to > modify the TTL of the MX r

Re: changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 10/10/2011 15:42, enigmedia wrote: > Hi All: If I need to set a short TTL prior to an MX IP change, do I need to > modify the TTL of the MX record, or just the A record the MX points to? > (There's just a single A record for the MX). You want to drop the TTL on the RR where the data -- the RHS

changing ttl of mx record

2011-10-10 Thread enigmedia
Hi All: If I need to set a short TTL prior to an MX IP change, do I need to modify the TTL of the MX record, or just the A record the MX points to? (There's just a single A record for the MX). ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind