Re: bind 9 multiple masters setup

2011-01-12 Thread Gordon A. Lang
uot;dev null" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:13 AM Subject: bind 9 multiple masters setup Hello, I have most of this worked out but I intend to setup bind in a multiple master manner. This makes me question a few things: 1. What can I use for the SOA MNAME? In the off chance a

Re: bind 9 multiple masters setup

2011-01-12 Thread dev null
Thank you all! So, it would still have rndc do the reload essentially and file copy because the masters would get the files via cfengine which we have working via scp. So basically it's not going outside of what bind provides. This is to quickly stand up several DNS boxes, even masters. Since th

Re: bind 9 multiple masters setup

2011-01-12 Thread Torinthiel
On 01/12/11 16:13, dev null wrote: > Hello, > > I have most of this worked out but I intend to setup bind in a > multiple master manner. > > This makes me question a few things: > > 1. What can I use for the SOA MNAME? In the off chance a box may die, > I am thinking of using a VIP which contain

Re: bind 9 multiple masters setup

2011-01-12 Thread Emil Natan
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:13 PM, dev null wrote: > Hello, > > I have most of this worked out but I intend to setup bind in a > multiple master manner. > > This makes me question a few things: > > 1. What can I use for the SOA MNAME? In the off chance a box may die, > I am thinking of using a VIP

bind 9 multiple masters setup

2011-01-12 Thread dev null
Hello, I have most of this worked out but I intend to setup bind in a multiple master manner. This makes me question a few things: 1. What can I use for the SOA MNAME? In the off chance a box may die, I am thinking of using a VIP which contains the multiple masters within it. However I am not su