Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-23 Thread Alan Clegg
On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Schulz > Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM > To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" > Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 > >>> I just rememb

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-23 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Thomas Schulz Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 >> I just remembered there was also the change to the db file >> having a default raw format on s

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-23 Thread Thomas Schulz
> I just remembered there was also the change to the db file > having a default raw format on slaves unless specified. Interesting. I did not notice that when it happened, but now that I look, I see that my slaves indeed have raw format files. Apparently the switch over did not require me to do an

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-22 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Mike Bernhardt Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 3:25 PM To: "'Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.'" , "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 >Thanks for that. I just remembered there was also the change

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-22 Thread Mike Bernhardt
: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 On 01/16/14 16:39, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Mike Bernhardt > Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM > To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" > Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 > >>

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-21 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
On 01/16/14 16:39, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Mike Bernhardt > Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM > To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" > Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 > >> Sorry for the double post, but

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-16 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Mike Bernhardt Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 >Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this: >And if it is indeed enabled regardless of my RFC1918 ranges,

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-16 Thread Mike Bernhardt
cing server which of course has no RFC1918, I would leave it to the default setting? -Original Message- From: Mike Bernhardt [mailto:bernha...@bart.gov] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:03 PM To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org' Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 Am I correct in

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-16 Thread Mike Bernhardt
t: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:47 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 IIRC, The main change I ran into when I upgraded to 9.9.2-P1 (from 9.7.6-P4) was the change in default for empty-zones. All are enabled by default, including RFC1918 ranges whether you have a

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-14 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
somewhere first...always good to confirm for your exact configuration. -Original Message- From: "", "P.Eng." Organization: Kansas State University - ITS/Enterprise Server Technologies Date: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:46 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subj

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-14 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
ing changes in default operation when > upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4? I'm specifically looking for changes that > must be addressed in named.conf options in order to keep an upgrade as > transparent as possible. > > Thanks, > > Mike > > ___

Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-14 Thread Mike Bernhardt
Is there anything I need to know regarding changes in default operation when upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4? I'm specifically looking for changes that must be addressed in named.conf options in order to keep an upgrade as transparent as possible. Thanks,