ailto:e...@isc.org]
Envoyé : dimanche 17 juin 2018 22:59
À : Nicolas Breuer
Cc : bind-users@lists.isc.org
Objet : Re: TR: Slave Zones for Bind 9.11
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 07:10:11PM +, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
> I’m not using the in-view.
> So, per default this is copied into memory In c
1000x thanks Evan for your advises.
I will try to modify the configuration with the allow-recursion options.
-Message d'origine-
De : Evan Hunt [mailto:e...@isc.org]
Envoyé : dimanche 17 juin 2018 22:59
À : Nicolas Breuer
Cc : bind-users@lists.isc.org
Objet : Re: TR: Slave
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 07:10:11PM +, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
> I’m not using the in-view.
> So, per default this is copied into memory
> In case of failure of primary the slave can take the lead but in case of
> a reboot, the slave will not download the copy
I think I'd have to see your config
Hi Evan,
I’m not using the in-view.
So, per default this is copied into memory
In case of failure of primary the slave can take the lead but in case of a
reboot, the slave will not download the copy
If using file option, i should use in-view and then duplicate the zone files.
The goal to have t
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 05:32:34PM +, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
> I have removed the file option in the zone configuration and I can now share
> the same zone on the two views.
> I suspect the zone to be transferred in the memory
If you're using "in-view", the zone isn't transferred at all. There
Hello All,
I have been migrated from Bind 9.8 to 9.11
Some big changes on the new version.
I have a zone file common for two views (one internal & one with recursion ON)
I have removed the file option in the zone configuration and I can now share
the same zone on the two views.
I suspect the z
6 matches
Mail list logo
