In message , seren writes:
>
> Thanks for your response. I didn't know about the +trace option in dig. =
> After some more searching, I believe you are correct about the long =
> responses being related. The responses that fail all seem to exceed =
> 512-bytes. Why this would happen in multiple l
Thanks for your response. I didn't know about the +trace option in dig. After
some more searching, I believe you are correct about the long responses being
related. The responses that fail all seem to exceed 512-bytes. Why this would
happen in multiple locations is a mystery but perhaps our fire
seren wrote:
Hi, I've run into some strange issues with BIND and CNAMES.
The examples you show indicate strange issues only with
whatever name server code is running on your localhost.
Nothing in your examples actually identify this as BIND.
We're using BIND9 (on Ubunt
Hi, I've run into some strange issues with BIND and CNAMES. We're using BIND9
(on Ubuntu) internally and have our external DNS hosted by NetworkSolutions.
Occasionally I'll be able to create a CNAME in NetworkSolutions that BIND is
unable to resolve.
Using dig I notice it's doing a query for an
4 matches
Mail list logo