On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:34 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> It makes the thread hard to follow!
what rot, its no worse than bottom posters, nor those who forget how to
trim replies to what's relevant, once you become responsible for this
list server, then you can choose, until then, please desist
In article ,
"Wilbert J. Rojas O." wrote:
> Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea.
See RFC 2317 for the mechanism to delegate subnets of a /24.
--
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
It makes the thread hard to follow!
> Why not?
> > Please don't top post.
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O.
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> My scenario is as follows:
> >>
> >> I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS
> >> se
Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea.
Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
Administrador de Sistemas.
Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411
El 23/11/2010 04:01
You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the
third server.
230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O.
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Hello!
My scenario is as follows:
I have the following network
192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS server for this zone
reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP upgrade to
a second DNS server is a sla
6 matches
Mail list logo
