Re: Secondary Master

2012-05-11 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , John Wingenbach wrote: > The concept of a "secondary" master is sound. It basically provides for > a healthy means of handling the situation where your primary master is > unusable. That's true, but the sample configurations in the OP's link did

Re: Secondary Master

2012-05-11 Thread John Wingenbach
The concept of a "secondary" master is sound. It basically provides for a healthy means of handling the situation where your primary master is unusable. To enable and support a primary/backup dns master, the backup master is initially setup as noted as a slave server. Any o

Re: Secondary Master

2012-05-11 Thread WBrown
John wrote on 05/11/2012 11:05:58 AM: > I found this article about setting up a secondary master. > This may be useful as we are bringing up a disaster recovery site. > The author explains that the zone type should be ?slave?? so it can > receive db updates from the normal master.

Secondary Master

2012-05-11 Thread Manson, John
I found this article about setting up a secondary master. This may be useful as we are bringing up a disaster recovery site. The author explains that the zone type should be 'slave'' so it can receive db updates from the normal master. Seems like that makes it a slave instead of a