In article ,
John Wingenbach wrote:
> The concept of a "secondary" master is sound. It basically provides for
> a healthy means of handling the situation where your primary master is
> unusable.
That's true, but the sample configurations in the OP's link did
The concept of a "secondary" master is sound. It basically provides for
a healthy means of handling the situation where your primary master is
unusable. To enable and support a primary/backup dns master, the backup
master is initially setup as noted as a slave server. Any o
John wrote on 05/11/2012 11:05:58 AM:
> I found this article about setting up a secondary master.
> This may be useful as we are bringing up a disaster recovery site.
> The author explains that the zone type should be ?slave?? so it can
> receive db updates from the normal master.
I found this article about setting up a secondary master.
This may be useful as we are bringing up a disaster recovery site.
The author explains that the zone type should be 'slave'' so it can receive db
updates from the normal master.
Seems like that makes it a slave instead of a
4 matches
Mail list logo