In message <561e91ed.3060...@clegg.com>, Alan Clegg writes:
>
> > Are there *any* current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV
> > records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a
> > server (analogous to the way MX records are used for mail).
>
> I guess it depends on
On 10/14/15 11:29 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> Are there *any* current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV
> records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a
> server (analogous to the way MX records are used for mail).
I guess it depends on what you define as a well
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Anders Löwinger wrote:
> Den 2015-10-14 kl. 17:29, skrev Barry Margolin:
>
> Are there **any** current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV
> records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a
> server (analogous to the way MX records ar
Den 2015-10-14 kl. 17:29, skrev Barry Margolin:
Are there*any* current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV
records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a
server (analogous to the way MX records are used for mail).
Examples:
SIP
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> To answer the question. What you do when given a name and a port
> is protocol specific. Read the protocol specification. Note if
> the port is the well known port for the protocol then it may be
> ignored.
>
> If the protocol does not specify most develope
ly used for
> mail, etc.
>
>
>
> - Kevin
>
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Chris Buxton
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:58 AM
> To: Harshith Mulky
> Cc:
ts.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Chris Buxton
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Harshith Mulky
Cc: BIND Users
Subject: Re: SRV Request to DNS
On Oct 5, 2015, at 11:51 PM, Harshith Mulky
mailto:harshith.mu...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Let us say we are
On Oct 5, 2015, at 11:51 PM, Harshith Mulky wrote:
> Let us say we are having a FQDN and we need to Resolve it. It goes through
> the procedure of determining the IP and Port using NAPTR/SRV/A query
> mechanisms
>
> The question I have is if I have a FQDN with a Port Number already
> determine
On 06.10.15 09:21, Harshith Mulky wrote:
Let us say we are having a FQDN and we need to Resolve it. It goes through
the procedure of determining the IP and Port using NAPTR/SRV/A query
mechanisms
no, the ordinary resolution does NOT use NAPTR and SRV records, only A
and/or records.
The q
Hi all,
I had a query
Let us say we are having a FQDN and we need to Resolve it. It goes through the
procedure of determining the IP and Port using NAPTR/SRV/A query mechanisms
The question I have is if I have a FQDN with a Port Number already determined,
will it go through the Procedure of NA
On 29/09/2015 07:37, Harshith Mulky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a query
>
> Let us say we are having a FQDN and we need to Resolve it. It goes
> through the procedure of determining the IP and Port using NAPTR/SRV/A
> query mechanisms
>
> The question I have is if I have a FQDN with a Port Number
Hi all,
I had a query
Let us say we are having a FQDN and we need to Resolve it. It goes through the
procedure of determining the IP and Port using NAPTR/SRV/A query mechanisms
The question I have is if I have a FQDN with a Port Number already determined,
will it go through the Procedure of NA
12 matches
Mail list logo
