RE: Seemingly random ServFail issues on a caching server

2011-09-06 Thread Florian CROUZAT
Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-31: > Lyle Giese wrote on 2011-08-31: > >> On 8/31/2011 8:40 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote: >>> Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25: >>> Hi list, On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I encounter sometimes (seemingly ran

RE: Seemingly random ServFail issues on a caching server

2011-08-31 Thread Florian CROUZAT
Lyle Giese wrote on 2011-08-31: > On 8/31/2011 8:40 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote: >> Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I >>> encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving >>> domain names

Re: Seemingly random ServFail issues on a caching server

2011-08-31 Thread Lyle Giese
On 8/31/2011 8:40 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote: Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25: Hi list, On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving domain names. A client (192.168.147.2) asks my caching server (192.1

RE: Seemingly random ServFail issues on a caching server

2011-08-31 Thread Florian CROUZAT
Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-08-25: > Hi list, > > On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I > encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving domain > names. A client (192.168.147.2) asks my caching server (192.168.151.100) > to resolve a target (www.

Seemingly random ServFail issues on a caching server

2011-08-25 Thread Florian CROUZAT
Hi list, On a few domains (we'll consider only one domain for this example) I encounter sometimes (seemingly randoms) ServFails while resolving domain names. A client (192.168.147.2) asks my caching server (192.168.151.100) to resolve a target (www.leclercdrive.fr) Here are the relevant logs: Au

Re: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-20 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:16:00 -0600, "Frank Bulk - iName.com" wrote: > My bad. Let me restate the request -- that all the information available > via XML in the HTML statistics channel is also printed out when issuing > "rndc stats". It's the opposite: all the information printed out when issuin

RE: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-20 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
f Of Barry Margolin Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:47 PM To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@moderators.individual.net Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues In article , "Frank Bulk" wrote: > Sorry for not being more clear. It's my understanding that "rndc stats" > dumps only

Re: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-19 Thread Barry Margolin
Administrator's Reference Manual for BIND. > > Regards, > > Frank > > -Original Message- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / ...@l@C#:H(B [mailto:jinmei_tat...@isc.org] > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:38 PM > To: Frank Bulk > Cc: bind-us...@isc.org > Subj

RE: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-19 Thread Frank Bulk
d-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600, "Frank Bulk" wrote: > Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at > least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and "rndc stats"? I don't understa

Re: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-19 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600, "Frank Bulk" wrote: > Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at > least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and "rndc stats"? I don't understand the question...what do you mean by 'feature parity between ARM and "rndc stats

RE: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-16 Thread Frank Bulk
M To: frnk...@iname.com Cc: 'Fr34k'; bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues At Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:24:28 -0600, "Frank Bulk - iName.com" wrote: > Yes, I read that last night before posting. I changed it to "256M". Is > there a way using rndc to see i

Re: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-16 Thread Thomas Schulz
>Frank > >-Original Message- >From: Fr34k [mailto:freaknet...@yahoo.com] >Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:45 AM >To: frnk...@iname.com; bind-users@lists.isc.org >Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues > >Hello, > >Has the "max-cache-size" setting in named.conf been c

RE: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-16 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
for about 6000 broadband customers and is an authoritative DNS server for 100+ domains. Frank -Original Message- From: Fr34k [mailto:freaknet...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:45 AM To: frnk...@iname.com; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues Hello, Has the &q

Re: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-16 Thread Fr34k
ous discussions on this. Thanks. - Original Message From: Frank Bulk To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 6:57:10 PM Subject: SERVFAIL issues http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122239920822324&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122243068905656&w=2 We upgrade

Re: SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-15 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> Is this intermittent SERVFAIL issue resolved in 9.5.1-P1? 9.5.1 has many improvements that solve various SERVFAIL issues seen in the 9.5.0-P1/P2 code and includes /dev/poll, kqueue, or epoll on supported systems. ___ bind-users mailing list b

SERVFAIL issues

2009-01-15 Thread Frank Bulk
http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122239920822324&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=122243068905656&w=2 We upgraded to 9.5.0-P1 when the Kaminsky DNS vulnerability was announced and have had intermittent issues with SERVFAIL problems for some DSL modems that don't properly fail over to a seconda