Re: Reverse Name Resolution Zone File

2016-06-13 Thread Mark Andrews
The zone is still delegated but the CNAME records that map the well known reverse names to the actual names holding the PTR records are not present in 233.202.162.in-addr.arpa. This needs to be fixed by AT&T. P.S. there is no point in two NS records if there is only one machine. 80/29.233.202.

Reverse Name Resolution Zone File

2016-06-13 Thread Ron Wingfield
Ladies and Gentlemen: At the risk of double posting . . .yet again (sending this time in plain text format), I'm reposting this question -- apparently my previous membership was purged or otherwise not valid. Regardless, after about eight months with no problems, AT&T U-verse has once again

Reverse Name Resolution Zone File

2016-06-13 Thread Ron Wingfield
Ladies and Gentlemen: At the risk of double posting, I'm reposting this question -- apparently my previous membership was purged or otherwise not valid. Regardless, after about eight months with no problems, AT&T U-verse has once again quit re