On 05/18/2018 08:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
why? is there any logic in this?
I can see a case where a hidden / internal master is used and only
accessible by direct slaves in a DMZ.
So the slaves in the DMZ act as a contact point for the world.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smi
>
> On 18 May 2018, at 16:16, Blason R wrote:
>
> why? is there any logic in this?
>
> yeah management does not want to allow direct syncing with master as they
> dont want to expose any info to them.
Interesting statement - especially since the slave servers will serve the exact
same dat
why? is there any logic in this?
yeah management does not want to allow direct syncing with master as they
dont want to expose any info to them.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 18.05.18 19:29, Blason R wrote:
>
>> I have this other query on RPZ; I have one m
On 18.05.18 19:29, Blason R wrote:
I have this other query on RPZ; I have one master server [lets say
masterns.test.com.] on cloud. One slave [slavens.test.com] in my
organization and our partner would also want to sync with slave but not
with master server.
why? is there any logic in this?
H
Hi Guys,
I have this other query on RPZ; I have one master server [lets say
masterns.test.com.] on cloud. One slave [slavens.test.com] in my
organization and our partner would also want to sync with slave but not
with master server.
How can one slave can sync with other slave? Can someone please
5 matches
Mail list logo