On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Samuel Lentz wrote:
> Thanks. It looks to be good. I did find this once and thought is was to
> good to be true. But after verifying the code is the same, I will be using
> this for further updates.
>
> I understand that CentOS if suppose to be a complete copy of
Thanks. It looks to be good. I did find this once and thought is was to
good to be true. But after verifying the code is the same, I will be using
this for further updates.
I understand that CentOS if suppose to be a complete copy of Red Hat down
to the software versions, but don't understand why
Samuel Lentz wrote:
>So will this be able to be a drop in replacement for bind in CentOS 6?
>
Yes. We use it for exactly that.
Why not just try it?
--
Sent from my phone with, please excuse brevity and typos
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mail
So will this be able to be a drop in replacement for bind in CentOS 6?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 16/08/2013 16:58, Samuel Lentz wrote:
>
>> I am trying to build 9.9.3-P2 RPM for CentOS 6. Is there a spec file
>> that I can use? I have been searching the mail list
On 16/08/2013 16:58, Samuel Lentz wrote:
I am trying to build 9.9.3-P2 RPM for CentOS 6. Is there a spec file
that I can use? I have been searching the mail list and google and
can't find anything official for 9.9.x
Carl Byington does a nice one:
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind
...whi
I am trying to build 9.9.3-P2 RPM for CentOS 6. Is there a spec file that I
can use? I have been searching the mail list and google and can't find
anything official for 9.9.x
Thanks
Sam L.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-us
6 matches
Mail list logo
