On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Warren Kumari wrote:
After having tried to use the distribution supplied packages (for multiple
distributions) my opinion is that building from source is the right answer for
BIND. The distributions lag more than I'm comfortable with, and BIND builds
cleanly from source w
fakessh @ writes:
> I recompile the source rpm fedora core 14 bind 9.7.3 to EL4 and EL5
> with koji see my blog for explanations
>
> http://fakessh.eu/2011/03/10/bind-9-7-3-sur-centos-5-5-depuis-rpm-source-fecora-14/
Yep, that works fine, and even on RHEL3.
_
I recompile the source rpm fedora core 14 bind 9.7.3 to EL4 and EL5
with koji see my blog for explanations
http://fakessh.eu/2011/03/10/bind-9-7-3-sur-centos-5-5-depuis-rpm-source-fecora-14/
Le mardi 15 mars 2011 à 09:45 -0400, Mike Diggins a écrit :
> I'm about to transition my name servers fr
So, how many servers are you talking about?
After having tried to use the distribution supplied packages (for multiple
distributions) my opinion is that building from source is the right answer for
BIND. The distributions lag more than I'm comfortable with, and BIND builds
cleanly from source w
updates for whichever (or both) you choose to
use.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Diggins
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:45 AM
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: RH
is helps.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Diggins
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:45 AM
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: RHEL5 BIND in PROD
I'm about t
I'm about to transition my name servers from Solaris 10 to RedHat Linux
5.6. I'm debating whether to compile BIND directly from source as I
usually do or use one of the RHEL packages, likely the newly released
9.7.0-6.P2. I would like to make our DNS a little more appliance based to
ease some
7 matches
Mail list logo