Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet

2013-01-09 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Gaurav Kansal Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 12:34 AM To: Sten Carlsen , "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet >Thanks for help. >My Firewall was dropping packet size larger than 512 bytes. >Cisco 5580 havin

Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet

2013-01-08 Thread Gaurav Kansal
Hi Team, Thanks for help. My Firewall was dropping packet size larger than 512 bytes. Cisco 5580 having ASA 8.3. It is by default blocking my EDNS0 Packet. Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Kansal On 12/31/12, Sten Carlsen wrote: > > > > > With the replies you have shown, the limitation is v

Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet

2012-12-31 Thread Sten Carlsen
With the replies you have shown, the limitation is very likely within your own walls. While it is possible that some router on the path between you and the test server limits the packet size, I would say it is very likely not the case, much less than 1% propability - according to my experience. I

Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet

2012-12-31 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/31/2012 10:54 AM, Gaurav Kansal wrote: I just want to test whether this limit is within my organization. Is any method available by which I can check this? https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/replysizetest ___ Please visit https://lists.

RE: query about EDNS UDP Packet

2012-12-31 Thread Gaurav Kansal
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 4:02 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet It means that something in your path limits packet size. That could likely be a firewall or router with a "helpful" function to pass DNS packets on; only it thinks that a DNS

Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet

2012-12-31 Thread Sten Carlsen
It means that something in your path limits packet size. That could likely be a firewall or router with a "helpful" function to pass DNS packets on; only it thinks that a DNS packet can only be 512 bytes long. On 31/12/12 10:49, Gaurav Kansal wrote: > > Hello Team, > > > > I am getting too many