Re: libbind 6.0

2013-02-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <6134bb3286a31d4db61e57114e8ba7c09152e...@seaembx01.olympus.f5net.co m>, Jack Tavares writes: > I haven't seen any answer on list, so I am resending in case > it got lost in "late Friday afternoon" mail queue. > > Thank you: > > > I have been using libbind(6.0) to do dynamic updates

RE: libbind 6.0

2013-02-12 Thread Jack Tavares
I haven't seen any answer on list, so I am resending in case it got lost in "late Friday afternoon" mail queue. Thank you: I have been using libbind(6.0) to do dynamic updates via res_mkupdate() libbind is not currently under development. Is there are replacement in bind9 that I should move t

Re: libbind 6.0

2013-02-08 Thread Phil Mayers
On 08/02/13 18:07, Jack Tavares wrote: I have been using libbind(6.0) to do dynamic updates via res_mkupdate() Out of curiosity, is there any reason not to port the code to something running in a higher-level language (or wrapper/script "nsupdate"?) FWIW we use dns-python for this. _