Re: Slave DNS disconnect...

2009-06-13 Thread Jeff Lasman
On Friday 12 June 2009 09:33 pm, Jeff Lasman wrote: > We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate > rDNS authority to our servers: .. Nevermind. Sorry to bother the list; the upstream tech now agrees with me. So may have been right. :) Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, Nobalo

RE: Slave DNS disconnect...

2009-06-13 Thread Frank Bulk
(For pay) tools like the PTR trace from DNSreports do a very nice job of showing how the reverse is delegated, step by step. Frank -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Lasman Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 11:34

Re: Slave DNS disconnect...

2009-06-12 Thread SM
At 21:33 12-06-2009, Jeff Lasman wrote: We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS authority to our servers: ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1) and ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2) But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one of the IP#s (chosen at random):