Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9

2022-10-26 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
The inline-signing feature will not go away. Thanks, Matthijs, I stand corrected. I believe I had seen that in ISC documentation and/or issues, but I will now stop saying that. :) -JP -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds t

Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9

2022-10-26 Thread Matthijs Mekking
On 24-10-2022 20:43, Richard T.A. Neal wrote: Jan-Piet Mens wrote: A Beginner's Guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9. Well done! A few comments, if I may: {snip} Thanks JP, I really appreciate the feedback. I'll take all of that onboard, change my zones and guide from master/slave to primary/s

Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9

2022-10-25 Thread PGNet Dev
so I'm interested to hear if this will still be supported or what the roadmap is for deprecating the ability to hand-edit these files for DNSSEC-enabled zones. +1. what "he" (Richard) said! here, or in my 'other thread' ... will be helpful to know. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/li

RE: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9

2022-10-24 Thread Richard T.A. Neal
Jan-Piet Mens wrote: >> A Beginner's Guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9. > Well done! A few comments, if I may: {snip} Thanks JP, I really appreciate the feedback. I'll take all of that onboard, change my zones and guide from master/slave to primary/secondary, and take a look at TSIG as well. As PG

Re: A beginner's guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9

2022-10-24 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
A Beginner's Guide to DNSSEC with BIND 9. Well done! A few comments, if I may: 1. in your zone stanzas you use the term "master" (type: master, ... masters {}). BIND has been updated already a while ago to support the term primary, e.g. `type primary;' and `primaries {};' (likewise for 'secon