Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-15 Thread Tony Finch
Kevin Darcy wrote: > > The "master" nomenclature is appropriate from a *data*dependency* > standpoint. The "master" holds the "master copy" of the zone contents ( > https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/master-copy). All > other copies are duplicates of that. There isn't in gene

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-15 Thread Leroy Tennison
Monday, June 15, 2020 1:33 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-15 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 6/15/20 1:15 PM, Michael De Roover wrote: > Of course I could, but I do not feel like the effort to change nomenclature > is either beneficial or worth taking for granted the requests of some people > on Twitter - as the slave to peer authority I am - given how much it affects > documentation

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-15 Thread Kevin Darcy
[ Classification Level: PUBLIC ] My 2 cents... The "master" nomenclature is appropriate from a *data*dependency* standpoint. The "master" holds the "master copy" of the zone contents ( https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/master-copy). All other copies are duplicates of that.

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-15 Thread Michael De Roover
Of course I could, but I do not feel like the effort to change nomenclature is either beneficial or worth taking for granted the requests of some people on Twitter - as the slave to peer authority I am - given how much it affects documentation, code, comments, general environment of the project

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-15 Thread Ben Lavender
Some servers already do Regards Ben Lavender On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:02 DeCaro, James John (Jim) CIV DISA FE (USA) via bind-users, wrote: > Or you can call the slave servers 'secondary' servers. > > > V/R > Jim DeCaro > DISA > Systems Administrator > Windows and Unix Server Operations > FE222/

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

2020-06-15 Thread DeCaro, James John (Jim) CIV DISA FE (USA) via bind-users
Or you can call the slave servers 'secondary' servers. V/R Jim DeCaro DISA Systems Administrator Windows and Unix Server Operations FE222/DoDNet Service Section Defense Enclave Services Directorate ☎ 301-225-8180 ☎ 301-375-8180 james.j.decaro3@mail.mil james.j.decaro3@mail.smil.mil "