Hi Petr,
Thank you for the quick response.
Yes, I said it before, the utilization stayed high. :)
I checked it now and I can see increased network traffic, memory and disk
utilization for the same time period.
Kind Regards,
Laszlo
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 09:14, Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 04. 03. 25
On 04. 03. 25 9:53, Laszlo Szollosi wrote:
Many thanks for your response.
By mitigation, I mean we have seen an increase in resource utilization,
but it would have been much worse without the 'minimal-responses'
setting (reduced impact).
By prevention, I mean we would not have had the impact a
Hi Petr,
Many thanks for your response.
By mitigation, I mean we have seen an increase in resource utilization, but
it would have been much worse without the 'minimal-responses' setting
(reduced impact).
By prevention, I mean we would not have had the impact at all.
By a spike, I mean the CPU util
On 28. 02. 25 14:23, Laszlo Szollosi wrote:
I'm hoping I can get some insight about the vulnerability mentioned above.
We had been running BIND 9.20.4 in our infrastructure, and upgraded to
9.20.6 just recently.
CVE-2024-12705 does not apply to our setup, yet we have a suspicion that
we were im
Hi Everyone,
I'm hoping I can get some insight about the vulnerability mentioned above.
We had been running BIND 9.20.4 in our infrastructure, and upgraded to
9.20.6 just recently.
CVE-2024-12705 does not apply to our setup, yet we have a suspicion that we
were impacted by CVE-2024-11187, but cann
5 matches
Mail list logo
