th J wrote:
> Hi
>
> How to configure a DNS server as public DNS server like google's 8.8.8.8
> server
> Help me to clear out these problem
>
> Thank you
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-u
Hi
How to configure a DNS server as public DNS server like google's 8.8.8.8 server
Help me to clear out these problem
Thank you
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing
---
From: terry [mailto:te...@list.dnsbed.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 08:26
To: bind-users
Subject: can I set the second nameserver to a public dns cache?
Hello,
I have only one nameserver for a domain.
Can I set the second nameserver for this domain to a public dns cache?
for example:
ab
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:35:06PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
...
> No. A cache is NOT authoritative for the zone.
...
Of course right. I concentrated on the form and missed the substance.
I was thinking of a service that will serve your DNS for you - which a
caching server is not.
--
/**
> Hello,
> I have only one nameserver for a domain.
> Can I set the second nameserver for this domain to a public dns cache?
> for example:
> abc.com. IN NS ns1.abc.com.
> abc.com. IN NS ns2.abc.com.
> ns2.abc.com. IN A 8.8.8.8 # 8.8.8.8 is google's public dns
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:25:46PM +0800, terry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have only one nameserver for a domain.
> Can I set the second nameserver for this domain to a public dns cache?
> for example:
>
>
> abc.com. IN NS ns1.abc.com.
> abc.com. IN NS ns2.abc.co
In message , terr
y writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have only one nameserver for a domain.
> Can I set the second nameserver for this domain to a public dns cache?
> for example:
No. A cache is NOT authoritative for the zone.
> abc.com. IN NS ns1.abc.com.
> abc.com. IN NS
Hello,
I have only one nameserver for a domain.
Can I set the second nameserver for this domain to a public dns cache?
for example:
abc.com. IN NS ns1.abc.com.
abc.com. IN NS ns2.abc.com.
ns2.abc.com. IN A 8.8.8.8 # 8.8.8.8 is google's public dns server
Since DNS cache does
for google public dns server
This crops up time and time again - perhaps +trace should have been +mimic.
The '+trace' option causes dig to act as a recursive server would, asking each
server in turn for a none recursive answer. Thus when you say +trace its your
instance of dig that&#x
details in the response hold your answer:
$ dig @66.231.91.222 google-public-dns-a.google.com
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1 <<>> @66.231.91.222 google-public-dns-a.google.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY,
In article ,
"M. Meadows" wrote:
> Can someone explain the following dig results? The first dig @8.8.8.8
> provides the expected result
>
>
> : dig +noall +answer google-public-dns-a.google.com @8.8.8.8
> google-public-dns-a.google.com. 85040 IN A 8.8.8.8
Can someone explain the following dig results? The first dig @8.8.8.8 provides
the expected result
: dig +noall +answer google-public-dns-a.google.com @8.8.8.8
google-public-dns-a.google.com. 85040 IN A 8.8.8.8
We get the same result from KLOTH.NET
(http://www.kloth.net/services
..@isc.org=
> =0A> Received: Friday, 15 October, 2010, 9:21 PM=0A> =0A> In message <81122=
> 2.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>,=0A> "Tech W." writes:=0A> > Hello,=
> =0A> > =0A> > like this domain:=0A> > =0A> > blogchina.org=0A&
--- On Fri, 15/10/10, Mark Andrews wrote:
> From: Mark Andrews
> Subject: Re: No cache for NS RR in public DNS
> To: "Tech W."
> Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
> Received: Friday, 15 October, 2010, 9:21 PM
>
> In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.c
ech W.
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: No cache for NS RR in public DNS
In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W."
writes:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig
In message <811222.51900...@web15706.mail.cnb.yahoo.com>, "Tech W." writes:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
>
> get nothing.
>
> But it do
On 2010-10-15 10:52, Tech W. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> like this domain:
>
> blogchina.org
>
> I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
>
> dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
>
> get nothing.
>From my perspective, blogchina.org has 12 authoritative name servers (as
Hello,
like this domain:
blogchina.org
I can't get its NS RR in public DNS:
dig blogchina.org ns @8.8.8.8
get nothing.
But it does work correctly.
for example, query the record:
dig udb.yy.blogchina.org
works!
How to setup Bind for this?
T
In article ,
Mike Mackintosh wrote:
> That is correct. I made the change like that to get it working
> temporarily. The registrar is pointing to the angrystatic.com
> nameservers, which the zone file is referencing the
> dns.angryserver.net host. I then had dns.angrystatic.com point to the
be unresolvable.
Thanks,
Mike
On Aug 13, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Lyle Giese wrote:
Mike Mackintosh wrote:
Hi All,
I recently set up a new web server for a group of hosts, and mirrored
the setup of bind off a working system. For some reason, the DNS is
not resolving off public dns server when
Thanks,
That was the answer i was looking for. Now it is making sense.
Thanks again,
Mike
On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Dave Sparro wrote:
On 8/13/2010 1:53 PM, Mike Mackintosh wrote:
How will the registrar be able to resolve the host name
dns.angryserver.net if dns is not propagating? I und
Am 13.08.2010 19:53, schrieb Mike Mackintosh:
Hi All,
I recently set up a new web server for a group of hosts, and mirrored
the setup of bind off a working system. For some reason, the DNS is
not resolving off public dns server when the nameservers for these
domains are directed to this
On 8/13/2010 1:53 PM, Mike Mackintosh wrote:
How will the registrar be able to resolve the host name
dns.angryserver.net if dns is not propagating? I understand that when
you register a domain, the registrar will send the nameserver
information to the root servers, which are then queried for your
Hi All,
I recently set up a new web server for a group of hosts, and mirrored
the setup of bind off a working system. For some reason, the DNS is
not resolving off public dns server when the nameservers for these
domains are directed to this server, and i cannot resolve any of the
zones
Jason Fesler wrote:
On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:00 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Thanks Jason! Will this work as Bind will examine the packet and will
have a different IP in the sendto: part
If your firewall/NAT is forwarding a public address to your private internal
address, it will rewrite t
On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:00 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Thanks Jason! Will this work as Bind will examine the packet and will
> have a different IP in the sendto: part
If your firewall/NAT is forwarding a public address to your private internal
address, it will rewrite the packets in order to do
Jason Fesler wrote:
On Jan 11, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi, since I got no responses for this question could I rephrase it to
asking if Bind will do a zone transfer over public internet if the
servers have private IP addresses and are behind NAT with static port
definitions?
On Jan 11, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi, since I got no responses for this question could I rephrase it to
> asking if Bind will do a zone transfer over public internet if the
> servers have private IP addresses and are behind NAT with static port
> definitions?
Tell bind to slave
Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi all,
this is the first time I'm going to be playing around with a setup
like this so I'd like to get some advice:
I would like to run a master/slave configuration of Bind servers but
am confused about how to implement such a setup and the underlying
network fabric invol
Sorry, just to mention in addition that I currently run a master/slave
configuration for internal DNS queries within the NAT! Since the current
location of servers has only one static IP available I have only exposed
one of the servers to the web but in the new location I plan to get as
many IP
Hi all,
this is the first time I'm going to be playing around with a setup like
this so I'd like to get some advice:
I would like to run a master/slave configuration of Bind servers but am
confused about how to implement such a setup and the underlying network
fabric involved!!
First up, c
31 matches
Mail list logo
