On 19 Apr 2010, at 20:40, Chris Thompson wrote:
On Apr 19 2010, I wrote:
[...]
Of course, it could also prove there is no DS record for
private.cam.ac.uk, but the absence of NS records as well
apparently makes it think that private.cam.ac.uk is bogus.
More experiments indicate that somethi
On Apr 19 2010, I wrote:
[...]
Of course, it could also prove there is no DS record for
private.cam.ac.uk, but the absence of NS records as well
apparently makes it think that private.cam.ac.uk is bogus.
More experiments indicate that something changed between
9.6.1-P3 and 9.6.2rc1 - previousl
In message , Chris
Thompson writes:
> We have a forward zone (private.cam.ac.uk) and reverse zones (e.g.
> 16.172.in-addr.arpa) for a subset of RFC1918 addresses that are
> routed throughout, but not outside, the university network. Access
> to these zones is restricted to that network, as the re
We have a forward zone (private.cam.ac.uk) and reverse zones (e.g.
16.172.in-addr.arpa) for a subset of RFC1918 addresses that are
routed throughout, but not outside, the university network. Access
to these zones is restricted to that network, as the results would
not be meaningful elsewhere.
The
4 matches
Mail list logo
