In message <9f949ee6-6386-c986-698e-e4a46e6cf...@thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald
writes:
> Am 16.08.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Eivind Olsen:
> > I'm seeing some odd problems where BIND (9.10.4-P2) has issues resolving
> > getsurfed.com. This is when using the "510 Software Group" BIND 9.10 for
> > RHEL/
Am 16.08.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Eivind Olsen:
I'm seeing some odd problems where BIND (9.10.4-P2) has issues resolving
getsurfed.com. This is when using the "510 Software Group" BIND 9.10 for
RHEL/CentOS/Fedora.
why do you use a 3rd party package?
no problem here with bind-9.10.4-1.P2.fc24.x8
The nameservers are broken. They send back rcode 17 (which is yet
to be assigned) when they see a query with a EDNS option present
rather than ignore the option as required by RFC 6891. They also
send back RCODE 17 rather than BADVERS (16) when send a EDNS(1)
query. The servers also don't answ
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:04:14AM +0200, Eivind Olsen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm seeing some odd problems where BIND (9.10.4-P2) has issues resolving
> getsurfed.com. This is when using the "510 Software Group" BIND 9.10 for
> RHEL/CentOS/Fedora.
>
> I can do manual lookups of the domain with "dig"
Hello.
I'm seeing some odd problems where BIND (9.10.4-P2) has issues resolving
getsurfed.com. This is when using the "510 Software Group" BIND 9.10 for
RHEL/CentOS/Fedora.
I can do manual lookups of the domain with "dig" and point it to their
servers (dns0.getsurfed.com, dns1.getsurfed.com)
5 matches
Mail list logo