In article ,
Prabhat Rana wrote:
> So as long as named.conf host2 states it as master after the change even if
> SOA in the zonefile lists host1 as SOA. The file transfer will resume even
> when host1 is down?
Yes. When there are multiple masters listed, the slave tries to
transfer from ALL
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:44:30AM -0800,
Prabhat Rana wrote
a message of 68 lines which said:
> So as long as named.conf host2 states it as master after the change
> even if SOA in the zonefile lists host1 as SOA. The file transfer
> will resume even when host1 is down?
May I give an advice?
So as long as named.conf host2 states it as master after the change even if SOA
in the zonefile lists host1 as SOA. The file transfer will resume even when
host1 is down?
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Barry Margolin wrote:
> From: Barry Margolin
> Subject: Re: Multiple SOA
> To: comp-prot
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:19:20PM -0800,
Prabhat Rana wrote
a message of 16 lines which said:
> Is it possible to have more than one hosts assigned as SOA in a
> given zone file?
There is no reason to do so.
> Currently I have host1 as master and host2 configured as slave for
> x.host.com.
In article ,
Prabhat Rana wrote:
> Hello,
> Is it possible to have more than one hosts assigned as SOA in a given zone
> file?
> I have BIND 9.5 and two UNIX hosts as authoritative servers (host1.com and
> host2.com) for the domain x.host.com
> Currently I have host1 as master and host2 confi
Hello,
Is it possible to have more than one hosts assigned as SOA in a given zone file?
I have BIND 9.5 and two UNIX hosts as authoritative servers (host1.com and
host2.com) for the domain x.host.com
Currently I have host1 as master and host2 configured as slave for x.host.com.
In case if host1
6 matches
Mail list logo
