On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:22:24PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> I was mainly wondering about the comment:
>
> """
> dnsdist is still very fresh software. However, we are actively seeking
Hi Phil,
Thanks - that statement was accurate in March 2015 when we posted that item.
I have now replaced it w
On 16/09/16 14:16, bert hubert wrote:
Your question is justified of course. The history of dnsdist goes back to
2013. We spent most of 2015 ramping it up, and even as we were doing so it
was already being deployed, pre-1.0.0.
I was mainly wondering about the comment:
"""
dnsdist is still ver
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:03:31PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> >Sorry for running advertisement here. But please know dnsdist is software
> >neutral, it is not "powerdnsdist".
>
> I've never come across dnsdist before. Would you describe it as
> production-ready?
Hi Phil,
A large CDN, one of .nl
On 15/09/16 15:49, bert hubert wrote:
Sorry for running advertisement here. But please know dnsdist is software
neutral, it is not "powerdnsdist".
I've never come across dnsdist before. Would you describe it as
production-ready?
___
Please visit ht
> So what we recommend is using dnsdist to balance to your backends, and have
> it prefer one backend when all things are equal. Then run multiple dnsdists
> which each prefer a different backend. And then announce your dnsdist
> service addresses a few times over BGP.
+1 on this.
We moved from
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:41:31PM -0400, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > I read something about HAProxy but it does not manage udp connection and
> > the interesting security proxy/balancer DnsDist does not pass original
> > client ip for Bind-DLZ...
> >
> Your best option is something that can do the
On 14/09/16 20:41, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
Your best option is something that can do the job statelessly. As
Warren says, anything that keeps state (firewall, load balancer, etc.)
becomes a DoS target... or, at best, becomes the thing that runs out of
resources before your network or your DNS s
On 14 September 2016 at 12:17, Job wrote:
> Hello,
>
> which is the best load balancer for two or more Bind DNS Server, located
> in the same farm?
> I read something about HAProxy but it does not manage udp connection and
> the interesting security proxy/balancer DnsDist does not pass original
>
SDIST act as a bridge
> for the complete request/response, or simply redirects the traffic with the
> response bypassing DNSDIST?
>
> THanks,
>
> Frank
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "bert hubert"
> To: "Job"
> Cc: bind-users@lists.is
ks,
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "bert hubert"
To: "Job"
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September, 2016 13:43:59
Subject: Re: Load balancer for Bind
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:17:13PM +0200, Job wrote:
> which is the best load balancer for two or
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:17:13PM +0200, Job wrote:
> which is the best load balancer for two or more Bind DNS Server, located in
> the same farm?
> I read something about HAProxy but it does not manage udp connection and the
> interesting security proxy/balancer DnsDist does not pass original c
.
Regards,
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Job"
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September, 2016 12:17:13
Subject: Load balancer for Bind
Hello,
which is the best load balancer for two or more Bind DNS Server, located in the
same farm?
I read something abo
I’ve had great success using A10networks Thunder series and AX series for load
balancing dns servers, performing GSLB, and for setting up anycast addresses
for dns.
On 2016-09-14, 11:18, "bind-users on behalf of Job"
wrote:
Hello,
which is the best load balancer for two or more
Hello,
which is the best load balancer for two or more Bind DNS Server, located in the
same farm?
I read something about HAProxy but it does not manage udp connection and the
interesting security proxy/balancer DnsDist does not pass original client ip
for Bind-DLZ...
Thank you, regards!
France
14 matches
Mail list logo
