Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-11 Thread Evan Hunt
> That's what I mean with "key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of > 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set". Okay. But you also said it was deleted from the repository at or before that time, and clarified that this meant your script had deleted it. It needs to remain in the repository until *after* all

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-11 Thread Axel Rau
Am 10.05.2012 um 23:52 schrieb Evan Hunt: >>> key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set. >>> It has been deleted from the repository at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706, >>> but is still included by named 9.9.0 in the zone framail.de >>> (as of 2012-05-10T19:51:32). >> >> To

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Alexander Gurvitz writes: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Axel Rau wrote: > > > >> Did you delete it manually (at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706) ? > > Yes; i.e. my script. > >> If so, maybe it's still in the zone because BIND doesn't know the timing > >> metadata anymore ? > > I th

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Evan Hunt
> > key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set. > > It has been deleted from the repository at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706, > > but is still included by named 9.9.0 in the zone framail.de > > (as of 2012-05-10T19:51:32). > > To clarify: I'm using inline-signing. > The repo

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Alexander Gurvitz
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Axel Rau wrote: > >> Did you delete it manually (at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706) ? > Yes; i.e. my script. >> If so, maybe it's still in the zone because BIND doesn't know the timing >> metadata anymore ? > I thought that would be in the journal or internal reposito

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Axel Rau
Am 10.05.2012 um 19:55 schrieb Axel Rau: > key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set. > It has been deleted from the repository at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706, > but is still included by named 9.9.0 in the zone framail.de > (as of 2012-05-10T19:51:32). To clarify: I'm u

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Axel Rau
Am 10.05.2012 um 21:32 schrieb Alexander Gurvitz: > Did you delete it manually (at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706) ? Yes; i.e. my script. > If so, maybe it's still in the zone because BIND doesn't know the timing > metadata anymore ? I thought that would be in the journal or internal repository of na

KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Axel Rau
All, key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set. It has been deleted from the repository at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706, but is still included by named 9.9.0 in the zone framail.de (as of 2012-05-10T19:51:32). Is this a bug, triggered by my timing? Should I wait one more