In article , blrmaani
wrote:
> Thanks.. so if I dig further deeper on this it appears that the the
> query being sent to the subdomain's
> nameserver is NON-RECURSIVE. So, if the resource-records are already
> cached on the subdomain's nameserver (assuming non-authoritative
> nameserver here), t
blrmaani wrote:
> I have configured my named (BIND-9) to delegate a subdomain owned by
> our partner company.
It's not clear to me what you're saying here. Can you explain in more
detail? It's always better to use the real names, but if you can't,
make up something that is clear.
> The queries in
In message <937b61bf-c12f-4498-b20c-8cd5613bd...@z1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
blrmaani writes:
> I have configured my named (BIND-9) to delegate a subdomain owned by
> our partner company. The queries in the subdomain are failing
> intermittently.
>
> Our partner company IT team is not ready to
Thanks.. so if I dig further deeper on this it appears that the the
query being sent to the subdomain's
nameserver is NON-RECURSIVE. So, if the resource-records are already
cached on the subdomain's nameserver (assuming non-authoritative
nameserver here), then the queries are responded else the que
On 10.01.09 14:04, blrmaani wrote:
> When we delegate a subdomain, should the nameserver to which we delegate
> be AUTHORITATIVE?
yes
> What happens if the nameserver to which we delegate the subdomain is a
> NON-AUTHORITATIVE nameserver (eg., cache-only name server ). ? Could this
> be the reaso
I have configured my named (BIND-9) to delegate a subdomain owned by
our partner company. The queries in the subdomain are failing
intermittently.
Our partner company IT team is not ready to reveal their DNS
configuration.
When we delegate a subdomain, should the nameserver to which we
delegate
b
6 matches
Mail list logo
