---
> From: Michal Wesolowski mailto:gmic...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 client and negative cache - some doubts
> To: Sam Wilson mailto:sam.wil...@ed.ac.uk>>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:33 PM, S
In message , Sam Wilson wri
tes:
> In article ,
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > In message ,
> > Micha
> > l Wesolowski writes:
> > >
> > > After some reading my present understanding is that correct response to
> > >
> > > query when there is such record in the zone and there exists anothe
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message ,
> Micha
> l Wesolowski writes:
> >
> > After some reading my present understanding is that correct response to
> >
> > query when there is such record in the zone and there exists another record
> > of different type for the same name - is
In article ,
Michal Wesolowski wrote:
> My server is caching only, I don't administer ns*.az.pl servers. I'm just
> trying to understand if binds copes well with such an external error. As you
> pointed out both servers fails in some (different) way but second one does
> this only when queried f
ki
> > Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: IPv6 client and negative cache - some doubts
> > To: Sam Wilson
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Sam Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > In article ,
> > > Michal Wesolowski
In message , Micha
l Wesolowski writes:
>
> sorry for replying directly, still have some problems with gmail UI.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Michal Wesolowski
> Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 client and negative cache -
sorry for replying directly, still have some problems with gmail UI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michal Wesolowski
Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 client and negative cache - some doubts
To: Sam Wilson
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Sam Wilson wrote
In article ,
Michal Wesolowski wrote:
> Hello Everyone
>
> I have a problem with Bind 9.3.6-P1 (included in Solaris 10) but honestly I
> don't even understand if it is wrong Bind behaviour or my ignorance. It does
> apply only to some specific cases when external domain delegation is also
> som
Hello Everyone
I have a problem with Bind 9.3.6-P1 (included in Solaris 10) but honestly I
don't even understand if it is wrong Bind behaviour or my ignorance. It does
apply only to some specific cases when external domain delegation is also
somewhat broken. My server is caching only. Let me show
9 matches
Mail list logo
