On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 18:08:57 –0400, Kevin Darcy
mailto:k...@chrysler.com>> wrote:
I'm assuming you have forwarding set up. Make sure to set "forwarders { };" in
the aelabad.net zone definition. Failure to do so means that your recursive
queries for names in subzones forward out towards the Inte
I'm assuming you have forwarding set up. Make sure to set "forwarders {
};" in the aelabad.net zone definition. Failure to do so means that your
recursive queries for names in subzones forward out towards the
Internet, instead of following the delegations down to the
austin-energy.net nameserve
<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 3701
>;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>...
>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>gsstest.domain.com. 3599IN CNAME
>gsstest.domain.com.gslb.domain.com.
>gsstest.domain.com.gslb.domain.com. 19 IN A ip.ad.dr.es
>...
>
>
>-Or
IN A ip.ad.dr.es
...
-Original Message-
From: , Dan
Date: Monday, April 7, 2014 at 10:16 AM
To: Bind Users
Subject: Delegation of part of a zone to a global server load balancer
>What¹s the right way to delegate individual zone records to a ³global
>server load balancer², which is just a
What’s the right way to delegate individual zone records to a “global server
load balancer”, which is just a simple DNS server that checks to see if a
server is up and if so adds the address to the rotation for resolution.
I’ve tried simple delegation using ns records, but I don’t get resolution
5 matches
Mail list logo
