I agree that it could be the NAT firewall: some firewalls have features to
network-address-translate the answer portion of DNS responses.
Or with bind “views" (or “RRL") you could deliberately make it give
differing answers, but you’d know.
The firewall documentation might help.
Or you can test wh
Am 04.02.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Mike Hoskins (michoski):
Do you really want to return RFC1918 to the Internet? Not the end of
the world, but some consider it unnecessary information disclosure. :-)
funny to read that from a @cisco.com sender when all the DNS mangeling
in the last deacde i h
>"
mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org>>
Subject: DNS Server goofiness
I am having an issue with an authoritative dns server that sits behind a nat. I
have replicated this problem on two different servers on different versions of
bind which is why I am now perplexed. In the zone file the LAN
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:29 schrieb David Hornsby:
I am having an issue with an authoritative dns server that sits behind a
nat. I have replicated this problem on two different servers on
different versions of bind which is why I am now perplexed. In the zone
file the LAN address of the server has an
I am having an issue with an authoritative dns server that sits behind a nat. I
have replicated this problem on two different servers on different versions of
bind which is why I am now perplexed. In the zone file the LAN address of the
server has an A record. When the server is queried directly
5 matches
Mail list logo
